The presidential election
has fueled the United States into one big argument. It has sparked
conversations not only in this country, but across the world, causing
controversy wherever it may go. The news is filled to the brink with political
articles and conversations in this day always seem to come back to one topic:
the 2016 presidential election. The candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump, are two extremely strong forces with clashing views. The author has an
obvious bias and the reader is able to clearly see which side the author has
chosen, and that is the democratic side of Hillary Clinton.
Within the cartoon, Donald Trump’s brain is presented at
a size about a third of Clinton’s. This shows the viewpoint of the author, how
they believe Trump’s intelligence level is incomparable to Clinton’s. This
provokes a certain audience, one with the belief that Trump is the favored
candidate. This political cartoon is propaganda and is being used to persuade
the audience to change their viewpoint. On the brains of each of the
candidates, there are pictures representing where their knowledge comes from
and where their credibility resides. Trump has a Twitter logo on his brain and
Clinton has a senate seal. The difference between this is obvious; Trump does not
have the “brains” to be president because his only referral to being credible
is a social media website.
The author uses rhetorical devices such as comparison and
imagery to portray their message. They compare the brain of Clinton to Trump
using relative size. This comparison allows the author to clearly and
effectively show their standpoint. The imagery used is shown in the candidate’s
facial expressions. Trump, who is portrayed in an unattractive manner, is being
demeaned in the cartoon whereas Clinton is smiling and is seemingly confident.
The author’s purpose, to inform and persuade their
audience of the lack in Trump’s credibility, is conveyed successfully. The
author clearly takes one side of the argument and proves their case.